Here’s a lovely idea from Kelly Tenkely: a whole load of iPad apps classified according to Bloom’s taxonomy.

One of the pages from Kelly's attempt to classify some iPad apps according to Bloom's Taxonomy

I’ve had a quick look, and my conclusions are as follows:

I am not familiar with all of the apps. This isn’t a problem, because exploring them will be an interesting and worthwhile exercise in itself. If you work with colleagues, you could share this task between you, and then share your new-found knowledge with each other.
I am not sure I agree with all of the categorisations. For example, why is the RSS app in the ‘Understanding’ category? This isn’t a problem either: Kelly has provided a starting point for discussion. You could use this in a professional development session with your colleagues. Imagine the learning that will occur if you spend an hour debating about which app should go where.
Why can’t some apps be placed in more than one category? For example, the RSS reader app I just alluded to could also go in the ‘Evaluating’ category.
Is this complete? I doubt it. Which ones would you add to or substitute for the ones Kelly has provided?
Which ones would your pupils add?
What are the equivalent apps for Android devices?
What are the equivalent apps for your school’s laptops?

I really like this resource, not just because of its intrinsic usefulness, but for the potential it has to stimulate discussion and teacher learning.

Here it is: Bloom's Taxonomy of Apps